This study looked into the need for promoting youth entrepreneurship in the society, with a particular focus to Abakaliki local government area of Ebonyi state. The term “Entrepreneurship” entails the capacity and willingness to develop, organize and manage a business venture along with any of its risk in order to make a profit at the same time remaining self-sustaining. Most factors which include; low purchasing power have crippled the efforts of good number of youth entrepreneurs in the society, particularly Abakaliki. This study adopted survey design research method for its field work and 94 questionnaires were administered to ninety-four respondents. The data collected are presented using simple percentage table plan for easy understanding. Finally, the result of this study reveals that youth entrepreneurship when promoted is the possible solution to unemployment, poverty, and crime in the society and also the most effective means for the attainment of economic growth. In conclusion, if the youth entrepreneurs are provided with all the support and cooperation they need, over all development will be achieved in the society.
Keywords: Youth, Entrepreneurship, Promotion, Self-sustaining, Unemployment, Economic growth.
DOI: 10.20448/801.42.260.268
Citation | Onwe Friday; Eze Ogbonnia Eze; Mbam, Philip Ekene (2019). The Need for Promoting Youth Entrepreneurship in Abakaliki Local Government Area of Ebonyi State, Nigeria. American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2): 260-268.
Copyright: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License
Funding : This study received no specific financial support.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
History : Received: 3 May 2019 / Revised: 6 June 2019 / Accepted: 15 July 2019 / Published: 3 September 2019.
Publisher: Online Science Publishing
Highlights of this paper
|
Onyeike (2012) asserted that Entrepreneurship is the act of initiative and creative thinking, risk bearing and the activities that involves loss and profit making which takes place within or outside companies. This shows that Entrepreneurship can take place anywhere at any level, though it usually starts from micro to macro level. The most obvious example of entrepreneurship is the starting of new business. Entrepreneurship however in economics, includes; land, labor natural resources and capital which produce profit. Entrepreneurial spirit is characterized by innovation and risk-taking, and also an essential part of a nation’s ability to succeed in an ever changing and increasingly competitive global market place. Entrepreneurship as a means of earning which usually start from small and grow to big enterprise depending on the individual’s competency, requires young and vibrant people for effective performance. Youth or young entrepreneurs however are said to be more productive and active than their older counterpart (Chinedu, 2012). Research revealed that more than 280 young entrepreneurs in the 14 European countries bridge the gap between academic and the real market. In addition, over 22,000 students in Europe are practically involved in running of non-profit business. This helps them to build their entrepreneurial skills and learn how to become successful entrepreneurs (CNBC, 2013).
In Germany, youth entrepreneurship has been adopted by German Youth Apprentice Scheme (GYAS) as weapon against youth unemployment in the country. With regard to increased awareness of Entrepreneurship culture in Germany, more than 65 percent of the youths after school begin careers with vocational training (CNBC, 2013). However after this training, thousands of them flourish in different enterprises they engaged themselves and this has reduced Germany’s youth unemployment rate to 7.5 percent which is the lowest among European countries (Holly and Mohren, 2012). In Africa, Nigeria in particular, youth unemployment is lower compare to other countries of Africa. Omebe (2014) noted that about 65.2% of youths in Nigeria are self-employed and self-reliant through the help of Entrepreneurial activities. Onyeike (2012) maintained that youth owned enterprise in Nigeria flourish in different cities of the country most especially in Abakaliki of Ebonyi state, Ngwa, of Abia state, Onitsha, Nnewi of Anambra and other areas in Nigeria. He also added that youths ranging from the age of 18 to 28 years in Abakaliki excel in different entrepreneurial activities such as shoe making, tailoring, motor mechanic, hair dressing and barbing, welder (metal work), furniture work and so on. Chinedu (2012) noted that youths who are skilled workers such as mechanics, tailors, barbers, spare parts dealers etc., are well to do and self-reliant. Studies had dealt with cases circling on impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth, relationship between entrepreneurship and economic development, but there is huge gap created by the fact that not much work has been done on the very need to promote entrepreneurship, especially in a third world country like Nigeria which has formed the need for this study.
Onah (2000) pointed out that national decision makers have discovered that productive entrepreneurship is key to national economic development by enhancing employment creation, economic growth, adoption of new technologies and innovation capabilities. But not minding the relevance attached to entrepreneurship and the national development agenda set previously by various governments across Africa, the outcome has been seen not to have much impact in the society (Brixiova, 2010; Worlu, 2011; Ajagbe et al., 2012) .
Kennedy (2011) opine that with the huge data base of youths without jobs and underdeveloped private sector, Nigeria is principally interesting for analyzing matters concerning youth entrepreneurs. Oteje (2012) added that encouraging small and medium enterprises become a priority for decision makers. The emergence of youth entrepreneurs as a viable livelihood alternative is thus high on the policy agenda of the government. The study also provides new evidence on the longstanding factors hampering private sector development, including heavy government bureaucracy, widespread corruption, and limited access to finance (Kennedy, 2011; Worlu, 2011; Oteje, 2012). Carree and Thurik (2010) identified in their study that entrepreneurship has shown its importance as a key policy issue in economic development across countries. They further stated that it creates self-employment which is important for creating flexibility and productivity of the economic system and equally contribute to a higher degree of job satisfaction. And also it increases insecurity for those who are involved. Henrekson and Sanandaji (2019) discovered that entrepreneur brings about change in that it will displace the standing status quo and at the same time push the economy toward a new equilibrium when successful. They equally identified that it will generate entrepreneurial profits that exceed the risk adjusted market rate of return.
This study examined issues in:
The study adopted survey design method as its research plan and strategies for the field work. And because of the various categories of age, class and gender that constitute the study population, the study dealt with both educated and non-educated youth entrepreneurs including both male and female population. The 2006 population census for Abakaliki local government area was 2,176,947 which were administratively projected to 2, 880, and 400 in 2016 which was utilized.
With Yaro Yamane formular of n= N/1+N (e)2 the number came to 400 respondents. But because of cost and areas selected, 94 respondents were adopted for the research, standing very representative of the sampled zone. 94 questionnaires were distributed to the respondents; the educated filled it themselves, while the non-educated were guided and helped to fill the questionnaire. The study applied the simple random sampling, where every member of the respondents stood equal chance of being selected in the sample. And 94 questionnaires were properly filled and used for the analysis. The study employed administration of questionnaires from shop to shop, market places and the other designated study areas for data gathering. The researchers employed descriptive method of data analysis and used simple percentage table plan and frequencies.
Gender |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
Male |
58 |
61.7% |
Female |
36 |
38.3% |
Total |
94 |
100 |
Source: Field work survey, 2017.
The data in the Table 1 shows that 58(61.7%) of the respondents were males, while 36(38.3%) were females this means that majority of the respondents were male.
Age range |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
14-18 years |
10 |
10.6% |
19-23 years |
15 |
15.9% |
24-28 years |
28 |
29.7% |
29-33 years |
24 |
25.5% |
34-38 years |
17 |
18.1% |
Total |
94 |
100 |
Source: Field work survey, 2017.
Table 2 shows that 10(10.6%) of the respondents fall writhing the age range of 14-18 years,15 (15.9%) of the respondents fall within the age range of 19-23 years, 28(29,7%) of the respondents fall within the age range of 24-28 years, 24(25.5%) of the respondents fall within the age range of 29-33 years, and finally, 17(18.1%) of the respondentsS fall within the age range of 34-38 years.
Marital status |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
Single |
70 |
74.5% |
Married |
16 |
17. 5% |
Married with children |
8 |
8.5% |
Total |
94 |
100 |
Source: Field work survey, 2017.
Table 3 indicates that 70 (74.5%) of the respondents are single, 16 (17.5%) of the respondents are married, while 8(8.5%) of the respondents are married with children. This mean that majority of the respondents are single.
Educational status | Frequencies |
Percentage |
First school leaving certificate (FSLC) | 18 |
19. 1% |
Senior, WAEC certificate | 24 |
25. 5% |
Vocational certificate and others | 30 |
31.9% |
B.Sc. | 10 |
10. 6% |
NCE, OND, HND. | 12 |
12.7% |
Total | 94 |
100 |
Source: Field wok survey, 2017.
From Table 4, 18(19.1%) of the respondents acquired first school leaving certificate, 24(25.5%) of the respondents possessed senor WAEC certificate, 30 (31.9%) of respondents have vocational certificate and others, 10 (10.6%) of the respondents possessed B.Sc and 12 (12.7%) of the respondents had NEC, OND AND HND.
Occupational |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
Student |
23 |
24 .4% |
Civil servant |
10 |
10. 6% |
Apprentice |
20 |
21. 2% |
Sales official |
17 |
18. 1% |
Workshop owner |
24 |
25. 5% |
Total |
94 |
100 |
Source: Field work survey, 2017.
Table 5 shows that 23 (24.4%) of the respondents are students, 10(10.6%) students (21.2%) of the respondents are apprentice, 17 (18.1%) of the respondents are sales officials, while 24(25,5%) of the respondents were workshop owners.
Table-6. Religious affiliation of respondents.
Religious affiliation |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
Christianity |
55 |
58. 5% |
Muslim |
7 |
7. 4% |
Traditionalist |
18 |
19. 1% |
Atheist |
14 |
14.8% |
Total |
94 |
100 |
Source: Field work survey, 2017.
The data in Table 6 indicates that 55(58.5%) of the respondents are Christians, 7(7.4%) of the respondents are Muslims, 18 (19.1%) of the respondents are traditionalists, while 14 (14.8%) of the respondents are Atheist.
Table-7. The most effective means by which youth entrepreneurs can access startup capital.
Option |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
Family support fund |
30 |
31. 9% |
Personal savings |
25 |
36. 5% |
Friends |
18 |
19. 1% |
Loans |
21 |
22. 3% |
Total |
94 |
100 |
Source: Field work survey, 2017.
Table 7, indicates that 31, 9% of the respondents chose family support fund to be the most effective means by which youth entrepreneurs can access startup capital, 26,5% of the respondents chose personal savings, while 19.9% chose friends, and 22.3% respondents chose loans.
Options |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
A Youth apprentice |
20 |
21. 3% |
A youth who keep steady pocket |
10 |
10.6% |
A youth who sales goods |
24 |
25. 5% |
A youth who runs enterprises |
40 |
42. 5% |
Total |
94 |
100 |
Source: Field work survey, 2017.
Table 8 shows that 21.3% believe that a youth apprentice is a youth entrepreneur, 10.6% supports a youth who keep steady pocket, 25.5% supports a youth who saves goods, while 42. 5% support a youth who runs enterprises.
Options |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
Shoe making |
30 |
31.9% |
Cloth designing |
34 |
36.2% |
Wood work |
10 |
10.6% |
Trading |
20 |
21.2% |
Total |
94 |
100 |
Source: Field work survey, 2017.
The data in Table 9 shows that 31. 9% support shoe making as the best among the entrepreneurial activities performed by youths, 36.2% support cloth designing, 10.6% support wood work, while 21.2% support trading.
Options |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
Lack of start-up capital |
31 |
32.9% |
Academic pursuit |
10 |
10.6% |
Laziness |
37 |
17.0% |
Heavy taxation |
16 |
17.0% |
Total |
94 |
100 |
Source: Field work survey, 2017.
Table 10 shows that 32. 9% respondents believe that lack of start-up capital is the reason why some youths avoid entrepreneurship, 10.6% believe academic pursuit, 39.4% believe laziness, 17% believe heavy taxation .
Options |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
Idea |
43 |
45.7% |
Capital |
37 |
39 |
Energy |
6 |
6.4% |
Moral |
8 |
8.5% |
Total |
94 |
100 |
Source: Field work survey, 2017.
Table 11 indicates that 45.7% support idea, 39.3% support capital, 6.4% support energy, 8. 5% support moral. However, idea has the highest number of respondents meaning that idea is the major factor needed for entrepreneurial beginning and success.
Options |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
To acquire wealth |
33 |
35.1% |
To be self-dependent |
29 |
30.8% |
To show they can do it |
18 |
19. 1% |
Being their own boss |
14 |
14.8% |
Total |
94 |
100 |
Source: Field work survey, 2017.
Data in Table 12 shows that 35,1% support to acquire wealth, 30.8% support to be self-dependent, 19.1% support; to show they can do it, while 14.8% support being their own boss.
Options |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
As a life career |
50 |
53.1% |
As a temporary business |
10 |
10.6% |
As a salary assistance |
20 |
21.2% |
No decision yet |
14 |
14.8% |
Total |
94 |
100 |
Source: Field work survey, 2017.
Table 13 shows that 53.1% take their enterprise as a life career, 10. 6% take their enterprise as a temporary business 21.2% take their enterprise as salary assistance, 14.8% stated no decision yet.
Options |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
Youth entrepreneurs |
41 |
43.6% |
Adult entrepreneurs |
37 |
39. 3% |
Equal success |
16 |
17.0% |
No success |
0 |
0.0% |
Total |
94 |
100 |
Source: Field work survey, 2017.
The data in Table 14 indicates that 43.6% chose youth entrepreneurs, 39.3% chose adult entrepreneurs, 17.0% chose equal success, while the option no success has 0 respondents.
Options |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
Employment creation |
51 |
54.3% |
Mass production of goods |
23 |
24.5% |
Rapid industrialization |
20 |
21.3% |
No contribution |
0 |
0.0% |
Total |
94 |
100 |
Source: Field work survey, 2017.
Table 15 shows that 54.3% support employment creation, 24.5% support mass production of goods and services 21.3% support rapid industrialization, no contribution has 0 respondents.
Options |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
Lack of market demand |
60 |
63.9. 7% |
Age stereo-type |
4 |
4.3% |
Bad leadership |
30 |
31.9% |
Total |
94 |
100 |
Source: Field work survey, 2017.
The data in Table 16 states that 63.9% chose lack of market demand, 4.3% chose age stereotype, while 31.9% chose bad leadership.
Options |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
Financial support |
21 |
22.3% |
Conducive environment |
43 |
45.7% |
provision of vocational centers |
19 |
20.2% |
Encouraging youth empowerment |
11 |
11.70213 |
Total |
94 |
100 |
Source: Field work survey, 2017.
Table 17 shows that 22.3% suggests financial supports, 45.7% suggest conducive environment, 19 20.2% suggest provision of vocational training centers, while 11,7% suggest encouraging youth empowerment programme. From the above analysis, we discovered the conducive environment has the highest number of respondents, this means that if government and NGOs should work towards providing conducive entrepreneurial environment it would take youth entrepreneurship to a greater height.
Options |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
Greater extent |
34 |
36.2% |
High extent |
26 |
26.6% |
Low extent |
20 |
21.3% |
No idea |
15 |
15.9% |
Total |
94 |
100 |
Source: Field work survey, 2017.
Table 18 shows that 36.2% support greater extent, 26.6% support high extent,21.3% support low extent, 15.9% stated they have no idea.
Options |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
Employment creation |
50 |
53.2 % |
Industrialization |
44 |
46.8% |
Total |
94 |
100 |
Source: Field work survey, 2017.
From Table 19 53.2% respondents believe that youth entrepreneurship reduces youth unemployment because it creates employment opportunities, while 46.8% support industrialization
At the cause of this study, it was gathered that youth entrepreneurship is the most effective means for the attainment of economic growth and social development in the society. Meanwhile, the contribution of youth entrepreneurs in economic and social development can never be over emphasized. For example, during the field work of this study, it was equally gathered that when the economy of a nation is in distress, it requires only the intervention of the entrepreneurs for stability because of their creative and innovative ability. This study also reveals some of the factors that can promote youth entrepreneurship in the society. Finally, this study captured some factors that hinder youth entrepreneurship and at the same time proffer possible solution to such problems. Above all, the result of this study reveals that, if youth entrepreneurs are provided with all the necessary support and cooperation they may need, the overall development of our country is assured.
From the responses it is established that youth entrepreneurs in Abakaliki will contribute immensely to the economic and social development of the country through the following ways; through employment creation mass production of goods and services, industrialization and so on. It was equally gathered that most youths take their entrepreneurial venture as a life career and also that there are some entrepreneurial activities that are more suitable for females likewise the males.
However, this study equally found out that the assistance of both the government and NGOs are necessary for promoting youth entrepreneurship in the society. Reason is that, this study was able to capture some of the factors that hinder youth entrepreneurship and saw the assistance of the government and NGOs as the possible solution to such obstacles. For example, from the responses gotten from the respondents, it was discovered that youth entrepreneurship can only work better if the government and NGOs can provide financial support, vocational training centers and conducive entrepreneurial environment for the entrepreneurs.
The youths are generally believed to be the leaders of tomorrow and as well the future hope of a nation. So there is every need that the youths should be supported.
Entrepreneurship on the other land is a very important tool for economic and social development, so it needs to be encouraged especially among the youths. However in order to promote youth entrepreneurship, enhance economic and social development, the research recommends the following ways:
Ajagbe, A.M., B.A. Sholanke, T.D. Isiavwe and A.O. Oke, 2012. Qualitative Inquiry for social sciences. In the Proceedings of the Covenant University International Conference of African Development Issues, CU-ICADI 2015 held on 11-13th May, 2015, pp. 319-325.
Brixiova, Z., 2010. Unlocking productive entrepreneurship in Africa's least developed countries. African Development Review, 22(3): 440-451.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8268.2010.00255.x.
Carree, M.A. and A.R. Thurik, 2010. The impact of entrepreneurship on growth In : Audretsch, D.B, Acs, Z.J (Eds), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Chinedu, I.C., 2012. Fact about entrepreneurship Aba Abia State: Gavescon Publishers.
CNBC, 2013. The business of living an entrepreneurial approach in everyday. CNBC Report 2013. Available from http://www.cnbc/americas-to-states-for-business-2013.
Henrekson, M. and T. Sanandaji, 2019. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice. IFN Working Paper No. 1270.
Holly, S. and A. Mohren, 2012. Impact of working hours on work-life balance. Available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2135453.
Kennedy, O.O., 2011. Philosophical and sociological overview of vocational technical education in Nigeria. American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research, 6(1): 52-57.
Omebe, C.A., 2014. Human resource management in education issues and challenges. British Journal of Education, 2: 26-31.
Onah, F., 2000. Strategic manpower planning and development. Nsukka: Fulladu Publishing Company.
Onyeike, F., 2012. Entrepreneurship development. Osisioma Nngwa, Abia State: Good News Publications. pp: 12.
Oteje, D., 2012. Options for teaching poverty in the society. Enugu: Maryland press Ltd.
Worlu, R.E., 2011. Consumer–purchasing motives in Nigerian cellular phone market: An empirical investigation. Journal of Research in National Development, 9(1): 33-42.
Online Science Publishing is not responsible or answerable for any loss, damage or liability, etc. caused in relation to/arising out of the use of the content. Any queries should be directed to the corresponding author of the article. |